PART ONE: INTRODUCING DOCUMENTARY – WHAT MAKES A DOCUMENT?

Exercise: What makes a document?

Read the post ‘What Makes a Document?’ on WeAreOCA, including all the replies to it, and write your own comment both on the blog page and in your own blog. Make sure that you visit all the links on the blog post. http://www.weareoca.com/photography/what-makes-a-document/ Make sure your reply is personal and authoritative. Express your opinion on the topic of the blog and substantiate your comments with solid arguments, ideally referring to other contributions to the blog (Open College of the Arts, 2014:22)

So what does make a document?

This blog subject began in August 2011 and there have been another 8 and ½ years of comments since, and as others have said it is hard now to find something new to say on the topic.

All I can do is share what I think and respond to some of the bog post that have gone before.

To answer the question what makes a document it is necessary to visit the definition of document first of all. According to Wikipedia A document is a written, drawn, presented, or memorialized representation of thought. The word originates from the Latin documentum, which denotes a “teaching” or “lesson”: the verb doceō denotes “to teach”. In the past, the word was usually used to denote a written proof useful as evidence of a truth or fact.

The oxford dictionary says the noun document, is a piece of written, printed, or electronic matter that provides information or evidence or that serves as an official record.

This seems quite straight forward, however the header question “what makes document” does seem to have been appropriated in the blog posts to, is a photograph a document? So according to the above definitions of a document and my own understanding of it photographs are without question documents as they are a material representation of a fact – as long as they are not tampered with of course.

In terms of “what makes a document?” I found the discussions on the importance of time and context interesting. Rob TM (27.8.11) says that his view is whatever the context a photograph is always a document even when the context changes. Others like Amano (27.8.11) believes that without context documents can be misleading and that a photograph can only be a document when there are details that give clues to more than just a representation (28.8.11). Or curriehannan (25.9.13) who feels like a photograph needs to have context explained to be a document and is not a document just by being. Personally I’d say that a photograph is a document either with or without context as it gives us evidence of something.  Clarke (1997, p19) says that on a functional level a photograph depends on its context; this is true but even without context a photograph can still function just as a document.

With the issue of time and documents, Hannah fountain oca suggests that “every photograph is a document but with time can be more” (22.1.16). This ties into the argument about the importance of context as time, or rather knowing the time/history of a document can give an article context. Indeed Stan Dickinson (27.8.11) suggests that time and context are not mutually exclusive, and I would say that they are intertwined. I don’t think the actual time period or passing of time is relevant to whether a photograph is a document, however as Clarkes says time must also be important in making a photograph a document as it fixes something in time (Clarke, 1997, p 24), and therefore creates it as evidence of something that was.

I was also interested in the discourse on whether an online image is a document compared to a physical print (Judy Bach 31.7.14); this question would apply to any online evidence. I would say that as long as the document is pure (untampered with) then online evidence or representation are as much document as a physical documents.

So to answer the question “What is document?” I would say anything that represents something authentically, that is that is an accurate representation of something, however I don’t believe that we need to understand a representation or a photograph for it to be a document. As far as acknowledging that photographs are documents I agree with David Fletcher’s statement that “All photographs are in a sense documents, but not all are documentary” (5.9.17).

Reference:  

Clarke, G. (1997). The photograph. London: Oxford University Press. ? (2014) Photography 2: Documentary: fact and Fiction. Barnsley. Open College of the Arts

Open College of the Arts (2014) Photography 2: Documentary-Fact and Fiction (Course Manual). Barnsley: Open College of the Arts.

Next post: https://nkssite5.photo.blog/2020/04/29/research/

PART 1: INTRODUCING DOCUMENTARY – DEFINING DOCUMENTARY

EXERCISE- TRANSPARENT PICTURES: ON THE NATURE OF PHOTOGRAPHIC REALISM

Read the first three sections (pp.1–8) of the essay ‘Transparent Pictures: On the Nature of Photographic Realism’ by Kendall L Walton. Core resources: Walton_TransparentPictures.pdf Write a 200-word reflective commentary in your learning log outlining your views about Walton’s idea of photographic transparency (Open College of the Arts, 2014:20)

These are my notes from my reading:

  • Photography is thought to excel in being realistic. Evidenced by the use of photographs as evidence in courts, their use as evidence for extortion.
  • Photographs have an immediacy.
  • Edward Steichen amongst others said that photographs can be confusing, manipulated, subjective and falsified.
  • Walter suggests that they are realistic in terms of perspective, portrayal of detail and capturing the ordinary, but are they just more of what pictures possess and not so special in their realism? He says it’s not that photographs ae different but that they are just more realistic, and that is only if they aren’t blurred etc.
  • Andre Bazin believes there is a deeper gap between photographs and other types of pictures saying that “the photographic image is the object itself”.
  • Walton asserts that it is impossible that a photograph of something can “be” something as you can’t mistake a photograph of something flat but that there is a difference between photographs and pictures, in that a photograph is always a photograph of something that exists.
  • Walton asserts that photography is a “supremely realistic medium” and a “contribution to the enterprise of seeing” that can extend our vision and see things literally. The viewer “sees literally, the scene that was photographed. Whereas painting merely represent something.
  • Walton says that photographs are pictures through which we see the world and the photographed objects.

My reflections on Walton’s idea:

I have read the first three sections of this essay it is a conceptual and thought provoking article. I understand that although Walton believes that photography is a realistic medium this is actually in comparison to other methods of representation. Walton’s case for the realism of photography rests on his assertion that photographs are always of something that actually exists.

What particularly interests me about his ideas is that of photography as a way of showing and seeing rather than just representing. I was fascinated with his description of photography as similar to seeing through telescopes, mirrors and microscopes as a way of enhancing and opening up the visual world; so in essence we actually see the world through the photograph.

Reference:

Open College of the Arts (2014) Photography 2: Documentary-Fact and Fiction (Course Manual). Barnsley: Open College of the Arts.

TRANSPARENT PICTURES: ON THE NATURE OF PHOTOGRAPHIC REALISM Kendall L. Walton at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ee67/2102ee7067ed4260970cb018b0fa0f1e4988.pdf?_ga=2.126331661.1648460048.1581616969-2070965404.1581616969 Accessed 13.2.20

Next post: https://nkssite5.photo.blog/category/exercise-what-makes-a-document/

PART 1 INTRODUCING DOCUMENTARY: WHAT MAKES A DOCUMENT?

RESEARCH POINT 1: HISTORICAL DOCUMENTARY PHOTOGRAPHERS

We were asked to research some of the historical developments in documentary photography outlined above.

I have begun my documentary research with an overview using the book The Documentary Impulse (Franklin, 2017)

Franklin talks of the documentary impulse being evident 10,000 to 50,000 years ago as self- representation, evidenced by cave drawings and inscriptions in pyramids and other tombs. As captured by Sebastiao Salgado in 1986 when he took photographs of the documentary accounts of gold mining in Brazil’s Serra Pelada dating back to 700 BCE. So before photography this “documentary impulse was sutained by representations in painting, mosaic, ceramics and sculpture (Franklin, 2017, p14).

However it was photography that became the preferred way to capture scientific discovery and exploration in the 1900s. It evolved from the photographic keepsakes of the Victorian times (miniature portraits, postcards) and franklin points out that even work by some of the 20th century documentary photographers such as Sally Mann, Eugene Smith and Elliott Erwitt were in fact f their families (Franklin, 2017, p26).

Photography made the documentation of scientific exploration more objective than the romanticised representation of paintings, these were some of the early documentary photographs:

  • Tromholt’s photographs of both the Northern Lights and the peoples of northern Norway.
  • Francis Frith’s photographs of the Suez Canal at Ismailia (c.1860)
  • Timothy O’Sullivan (1867-9) images of Clarence King’s geological expeditions.
  • Carleton Watkin’s daguerreotype stereoviews for the US Geological surveys in the Yosemite Valley.
  • Herbert Ponting’s photo essays of China, Japan, Korea and Burma and magic lantern slides of Captain Scott’s first expedition to the Antarctic

Franklin suggests that the term documentary was first used by Grierson in 1926 referring to a film, but had been used in France to describe films about travel and exploration as far back as 1911.

Reference:

Franklin, S., 2017. The Documentary Impulse. London: Phaidon Press.

SELECTED EARLY DOCUMENTARY PHOTOGRAPHERS

I’ve chosen at this point to research two photographers mentioned in the OCA handbook that to this point that I’ve not researched before:

Felice Beato (1832–1909)

Was among the first photographers to provide images of newly opened countries such as India, China, Japan, Korea, and Burma. As a war photographer he captured several conflicts: the Crimean War in 1855–56, where he took photographs in difficult conditions.

He photographed the aftermath of the Indian Mutiny in 1858–59, and set up studio in Calcutta and travelled behind The Army throughout India. Typical of his work is this photograph of devasted buildings in Lucknow after the Indian rebellion of 1858; in some images like the one below, adding corpses and arranged bones to heighten the dramatic effect of the massive  slaughter that occurred at Lucknow.

Interior of the Secundrabagh after the Slaughter of 2,000 Rebels, Lucknow, Felice Beato, 1858 (Getty Center Exhibitions)

He also documented the Second Opium War in 1860, entering Hong Kong with British forces en-route to invading china, carrying for the 8 months the heavy equipment needed for the albumen process (chemicals and large, fragile glass plates). Once again many of his images post battle scenes were very graphic. This one of the  Fort Taku captures senseless slaughter.

(Beato, The Met 2020)

The Fort was stormed following an explosion, captured as part of a long struggle by Western nations to open China to trade. Beato’s photographs, from inside the fort, shows the bloodbath carnage with a brutal directness (The Met, 2020).

Beato worked in a variety of ways including topographical and architectural views, including panoramas, as well as portraits and costume studies of the countries he visited or in which he resided. In China he photographed both Chinese and British notables and also made architectural views of the cities of Peking and Canton like the on ebelow of the shops of Treasury Street.


Treasury Street, Canton, Felice Beato (Getty Center Exhibition

Beato took probably the only photographs ever made of the interior of the summer palace north of Peking, before it was destroyed by fire, by order of Lord Elgin.

Beato then spent more than 20 years in Japan (1863–84), where he opened a gallery. Here he used the wet-collodion method, reducing the length of exposure to seconds and made the first hand-coloured photographs and albums:


Beato (Getty Center Exhibitions)

Beato accompanied the American expedition to Korea in 1871 to negotiate after an international incident; the country had been “closed”. The negotiations resulted in violence, killings and captures; Beato documented the successes of the American in the campaign like this image captures American military officers posing in front of a captured Korean flag they captured at Fort McKee.


The Flag of the Commander in Chief of the Korean Forces, Felice Beato, June 1871 (Getty Center Exhibitions)

Beato worked in Burma (1887–1905)which was a province of British India and a tourist destination for Westerners. He established himself by finding then capturing the interesting landscapes and architectural views, and combined this with portrait studies.


The Forty-nine Gautamas in the Sagaing Temple, Felice Beato, 1887–95 (Getty Center Exhibitions)

His brother Antonio Beato also a partner of james Robertson photographed Constantinople, Athens, The Crimera, Malta, and the Holy Land (1851-57). Antonia had a studio in Luxor was best known for his photographs of the Middle East whilst working with archaeologists on excavations and making views for tourists.

My reflections: I am particularly struck with the variety of his portfolio. His photographs were very varied, battle fields, architecture, portraits and records of overseas life at the end of the 19th century. Felice Beato was one of the first professional photographers to extensively document Japan and China. His style of photography of battlefields, were shockingly innovative, not only because he was the first to show images of the dead, where he pioneered a new style of war photography in a graphic way.

References:

Felice Beato: A Photographer on the Eastern Road (Getty Center Exhibitions) (2020) At: https://www.getty.edu/art/exhibitions/beato/ (Accessed 23/04/2020).

Felice Beato [After the Capture of the Taku Forts] The Met (s.d.) At: https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/283169 (Accessed 24/04/2020).

Albert Khan (1860-1940)

He was a French Banker and Philanthropist who from 1909 started documenting every culture of the global human family. He financed and sent a team of photographers and cinematographers to take pictures of everyday life and it’s peoples from 50 countries around the world, until 1931 an ambitious project. He used the autochrome process, the first industrial technique for coloured photographs developed by the Lumière brothers in 1907, to record 72, 000 images of cultures around the world. He kept very organised records in files at his home, now called “The Archives of the Planet” containing both films and pictures. Unfortunately, his work ended when he became bankrupt in the Great Depression.


Macedonian men photographed by Auguste Léon in 1913.

Stéphane Passet’s autochrome of the Boat of Purity and Ease in Beijing, China in 1912

A Buddhist monk in Beijing, photographed in 1913 by Stéphane Passet.

A Buddhist monk in Beijing, photographed in 1913 by Stéphane Passet.

An autochrome plate of a Senegalese soldier made by Stéphane Passet

An autochrome of the Eiffel Tower included in “Archives of the Planet.”

My reflections: Again I am most surprised at the variety of work that he commissioned and collected, although his images were more controlled and pictorial than Beato’s.

References:

Albert Kahn photography collection: The dawn of the colour photograph – Kahn – Albert Kahn (2016) At: http://albertkahn.co.uk/albert-kahn-photography-collection-dawn-colour-photograph/ (Accessed 26/04/2020).

Interesting, A. T. (2015) 44 Stunning Color Photos Of The World’s Cultures 100 Years Ago. At: https://allthatsinteresting.com/albert-kahn-archives-of-the-planet (Accessed 26/04/2020).

Next post: https://nkssite5.photo.blog/category/coursework/part-1-introducing-documentary/what-makes-a-document/exercise-transparent-pictures/

PART 1 INTRODUCING DOCUMENTARY: DEFINING DOCUMENTARY

EXERCISE- WHAT IS DOCUMENTARY

Listen to Miranda Gavin talking about documentary photography at: http://oca-student.com/node/100125 . In your learning log, write a 200-word reflective commentary setting out your reactions to Gavin’s viewpoint. (Open college of the Arts, 2014:17)

Gavin mentions some of the different approaches to documentary photography such as documentary, reportage, photojournalism. Gavin describes how the terms used are affected by access to them changing currently due to the digital platforms that are now available and an increasing number of women photographers. This means that topics are changing or being shown in new ways; consequently, the terms that we use are being probed. Gavin also talks about how the magazine separate out categories explaining that magazine sections make decisions where to place photographs difficult. She concludes that the categories need to be flexible.

To complicate things further documentary photography has had various definitions. The French word “Documentaire” was used to describe serious films about travel and exploration (Franklin, 2017). Bates highlights the growth of the term documentary to the rise of the large-scale mass press in the 1920s and 30s, photo magazines with stories of everyday life (social documentaries) which are very different to documents as simply as evidence; so even early on it’s the use of the term documentary there is a problem of definition.

Today there is also the debate over whether documentary should only include objective images, and indeed whether any image can be objective. Indeed, even placing an image within a certain section of a magazine or in a certain arena or to a particular audience is editing in itself and may render an image less neutral. However, if we don’t separate documentary into sub groups then it becomes a huge and possibly meaningless category.

If documentary photography is there to inform, with the variety of documentary forms today some thought needs to be given to why the image was taken, when decisions are made what to do with an image as placing the image exercises control over its interpretation. Like Gavin I do not believe blanket subgroups can be created with hard borders, as the subjects and audiences are constantly evolving and categorisation needs constant evaluation to be useful – an awareness of some of the factors that may distort the purpose of an image is important when documentary images are evaluated.

References:

Bate, D. (2016) Photography: The Key Concepts. New York. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Franklin, S., 2017. The Documentary Impulse. London: Phaidon Press.

Open College of the Arts (2014) Photography 2: Documentary-Fact and Fiction (Course Manual). Barnsley: Open College of the Arts.

Next post: https://nkssite5.photo.blog/category/research/a1-research/historical-documentary-photographers/